Board Thread:Wiki General Discussion/@comment-25406802-20190828050041/@comment-39204615-20190828203647

Why prevent regular editors from editing the page then? Some will probably know information about the demon list that you do not.

What constraints do you have when determining whether or not an article about the demon list is "quality?" The old article had relevant information about the demon list. The new one does not. Yes, you have probably accumulated quite a bit of information since, but clearly nothing that can be formed into a section. Otherwise, you would have added it to the article already. At the very least, please add an introductory paragraph and a link to the list.

You claim that the revamp is "for the sake of clarity." While I will admit that the old article left out a lot of information, it was clear and to the point. Yes, the history section being the only section was kind of weird, but there was no reason to remove it.