Thread:GD Protostar/@comment-25407271-20190304203504/@comment-25406802-20190305142624

Our decisions to delete pages are based on a number of reasons, in which case most of them are made by our intuitions, either alone or collectively as a staff. The reasons include:
 * Lack of information to keep article alive
 * Lack of relevance to this day
 * Level or page is unknown and doesn't require its own page
 * Spam page
 * etc.

Before I conducted a series of deletion, there were around 815 pages in this wiki. Staff and certain "veteran" users here have noticed the number of pages that have been stubs for an extensive amount of time to the point that there has been little to no effort in trying to fix this, from either staff or regular users.

Furthermore, there has been a number of pages that has found itself fall into the last of viewed pages, for the week or even for months, where barely anyone have cared to visit the page, due to either its lack of relevance or disinterest. As such, these pages would get removed since there is no need to keep something that nobody would use.

Lastly, we deleted pages that seem to have lost relevance to this day, such as certain Undertale levels, while still leaving Megalovania as a highlight of the recreation of the mechanics of Undertale. A good portion of "irrelevant" levels were found in the "unrated levels" section, where some pages are either pages regarding themselves for attention to pages of a level that is not even known, or people wouldn't know to this day. For this, I would have conducted a series of deletion for those pages.

For the Hilo article, I can see reasoning as to his page staying, as he is practically a mobile legend, beating a series of extreme demons through a mobile device, which is a major accomplishment. It could have been possible that Protostar may not have known the user himself and thus deleted it.

While we are staff, it doesn't mean we virtually cannot make mistakes, and we can look forward to fixing these errors especially with a bit of insight from regular users. It, however, does not mean it is acceptable to call a staff out and accuse them for "Vandalism".

About the three unrated pages I deleted, I haven't seen much relevance of them and neither did others, but I'd be happy to reason with users to potentially revive them back.

I hope you understand the nature of this post, and I hope we can come to a reasoning.