Thread:Wayld02/@comment-25407271-20180114221410

Hello, Wayld.

I will go straight to business and inform you that I have decided to work this wiki with one of my friends, and I will require your help and everyone else's. It has come to my attention people listen to your thoughts, so you are the guy I have to approach. Since you are not familiar with my 'behind the scenes' talking, I will try to summarize the plan as shortly and concrete as I can for you to review it and give an input.

This wiki's main problem is the disorganisation and the general underachievements.

It has come to my attention that there are 900 articles, 600 of them do not even reach 25 edits. As a matter of fact, 15 edits take up to 500 articles, more than 50% of them. There are potential ways to solve this problem that I can see:


 * 1) We remove all of them and start over, steady and calm
 * 2) We remove articles that do not have more than $$x$$ edits in total
 * 3) We remove articles that are short, which are often low-faith, therefore, lacking
 * 4) We group them in articles that contain all of them

The way I see it, all the ways are very complicated. By far, the 'easiest' way to make it work are the second or the third option. I discussed this matter with Irber and he informed me about the amount of articles one would be removing if you picked them from the $$x$$ variable in editing, so this one would be the least... Comfortable to work with? Not to mention the amount of broken links that we would leave behind.

As for categories, I think there are way too many and it clusters the visuals. I suggest that:


 * 1) We remove all of them before we delete articles so that we do not get 'uncategorized pages' notifications
 * 2) We seal the deal about decreasing the article counter
 * 3) We re-categorize everything in a very well-thought manner

Simple as that, I believe.

Things like designs I should work with ease. I am experienced in CSS and I can pull off something simple, yet stable, for this site. I do not know, this is not really important for the moments.

Staff is a more complicated matter. I do not mind working with what we have now, but I should inform you that I am more than willing to take actions against anyone who does not agree with the change as it is fairly obvious that it is needed. This is something that requires effort, patience and dedication, and I cannot let a random folk try to fuck it up.

This is not really important for the time being, we as bureaucrats should overlook this for the moment and wait for when the time really comes.

That is about it for now, your opinion is welcome. Thank you for your time. 